The Urban Diet of the Winnipeg Raccoon: A Trash Audit Analysis

Abstract

Urban raccoon populations (Procyon lotor) have demonstrated remarkable adaptability to anthropogenic environments, with food waste representing a critical dietary component. This study examines the feeding preferences of raccoons in Winnipeg, Manitoba, through systematic analysis of disturbed residential waste. We conducted waste composition audits at 45 residential sites over a 16-week period, documenting the selective removal patterns of food items from household garbage. Results indicate that raccoons exhibit strong preferences for high-calorie, lipid-rich food waste, particularly processed baked goods (34% of items disturbed), meat products (28%), and fruits (22%). Statistical analysis revealed significant correlations between food energy density and removal probability (r = 0.67, p < 0.001). These findings provide evidence-based recommendations for municipal waste management strategies, suggesting that secure containment of high-attractant food categories could reduce human-wildlife conflict by an estimated 40-60%. The research contributes to understanding urban mesocarnivore ecology and offers practical applications for coexistence with wildlife in Canadian cities.

Keywords: Procyon lotor, urban ecology, waste management, food preferences, anthropogenic resources, human-wildlife conflict

Introduction

The urbanization of wildlife represents one of the most significant ecological phenomena of the Anthropocene, with medium-sized omnivores demonstrating particular success in human-dominated landscapes (Gehrt, 2003). The common raccoon (Procyon lotor) exemplifies this adaptive capacity, having established dense populations throughout North American cities where anthropogenic food sources provide reliable, high-calorie alternatives to natural foraging (Prange et al., 2004). In Winnipeg, Manitoba, raccoons have become increasingly visible members of the urban fauna, with the City of Winnipeg's Animal Services reporting a 43% increase in raccoon-related service calls between 2018 and 2022 (City of Winnipeg, 2023).

The dietary flexibility of raccoons, characterized by their omnivorous feeding strategy, positions them as ideal subjects for examining wildlife adaptation to urban environments. Rulison et al. (2012) demonstrated that raccoon dietary composition reflects habitat characteristics more strongly than geographic location, suggesting that urban populations develop feeding behaviours specifically adapted to available anthropogenic resources. Recent physiological research has revealed concerning health implications of this dietary shift, with urban raccoons exhibiting significantly elevated body mass and blood glucose levels compared to rural conspecifics (Schulte-Hostedde et al., 2018). These metabolic changes indicate that the urban diet, characterized by high concentrations of processed foods and simple carbohydrates, produces measurable physiological stress in wildlife populations.

Canadian municipalities generate substantial quantities of organic waste that remain accessible to wildlife despite waste management infrastructure. Statistics Canada (2024) reported that residential sources produced 10.9 million tonnes of waste in 2020, with organic materials comprising approximately 31.8% of diverted materials, suggesting that significant quantities of food waste enter the disposal stream. In Manitoba specifically, waste management practices have undergone substantial evolution, with provincial guidelines emphasizing the importance of securing attractants to reduce wildlife conflict (Manitoba Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures, 2024). However, these recommendations lack specificity regarding which food categories present the greatest attractant potential.

The composition of Canadian household waste provides important context for understanding raccoon foraging opportunities. Research on food waste composition during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that fruits and vegetables constituted 34% of avoidable food waste, followed by other foods at 20% and bread and bakery products at 18% (von Massow et al., 2022). These data establish baseline expectations for food availability in residential waste streams, though the actual materials selected by raccoons may differ substantially from waste composition due to selective foraging behaviours.

Previous research on urban raccoon diets has relied primarily on scat analysis and stable isotope techniques (Prange & Gehrt, 2007), which provide valuable information about consumed materials but offer limited insight into selection processes when multiple food options are available. A trash audit approach, systematically documenting the contents of raccoon-disturbed versus undisturbed waste, enables direct measurement of food preferences through revealed preference methodology. This approach parallels established waste characterization protocols used in municipal waste management (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2020) but focuses specifically on wildlife selection patterns rather than overall waste composition.

The objective of this research was to identify specific food waste categories that attract raccoons most strongly, thereby providing an empirical foundation for targeted waste management recommendations. We hypothesized that raccoons would demonstrate preferential selection for high-calorie, lipid-rich foods consistent with optimal foraging theory, and that these preferences would be sufficiently consistent to inform practical waste management interventions. By combining detailed waste composition analysis with behavioural observations, this study bridges the gap between academic wildlife ecology and applied urban management, offering evidence-based guidance for reducing human-wildlife conflict while supporting raccoon populations in urban environments.

Methods

Study Area

This research was conducted in the residential neighbourhoods of South Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (49°49'N, 97°09'W), between May and September 2024. Winnipeg's climate is characterized by cold winters and warm summers, with the study period encompassing the peak season for raccoon activity and foraging. The study area included primarily single-family residential properties with mature tree canopy and established raccoon populations, distributed across three neighbourhoods: Fort Richmond, River Heights, and Charleswood. These neighbourhoods were selected to represent typical residential areas with standard municipal waste collection services and varying levels of raccoon activity based on preliminary reports to city services.

The study region experiences biweekly curbside waste collection, with residents placing containers at the curb the evening before scheduled pickup. This pattern creates predictable opportunities for raccoon foraging during overnight hours. According to Manitoba Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures (2024), Winnipeg lies within documented raccoon habitat range, with populations increasing in density over the past two decades.

Sampling Design

We employed a systematic sampling approach modified from municipal waste audit protocols (BOMA Canada, 2023) and adapted specifically for wildlife behavioral analysis. A total of 45 residential properties were recruited through community outreach, with property owners providing informed consent and agreeing to participate for the 16-week study duration. Properties were selected to ensure spatial distribution across the study area and included only those with evidence of raccoon visitation (tracks, scat, or previous disturbance).

Each property was assigned to one of three treatment conditions: (1) standard municipal waste containers without modifications (control), (2) containers with partial securing (bungee cord closures), or (3) fully secured containers (locking mechanisms). This design allowed examination of both food preferences and the effectiveness of securing strategies, though the current paper focuses primarily on preference data from control and partial-securing conditions where raccoon access was possible.

Waste Composition Documentation

Waste composition audits were conducted weekly following the methodology established by von Massow et al. (2022) for household food waste characterization, with modifications to capture wildlife interaction patterns. On the evening before scheduled waste collection, research team members documented the contents of participating households' garbage containers using a standardized protocol.

Pre-disturbance documentation involved photographing container contents and recording the presence and approximate mass of 12 food waste categories: (1) bakery products and bread, (2) meat and poultry, (3) dairy products, (4) fruits, (5) vegetables, (6) processed snack foods, (7) fast food packaging with residue, (8) pasta and grains, (9) eggs and egg products, (10) desserts and confections, (11) condiments and sauces, and (12) mixed prepared foods. These categories were developed based on Statistics Canada's National Waste Characterization Study (Environment and Climate Change Canada, 2020) and modified to reflect food types commonly available in residential waste.

Following overnight exposure to potential raccoon foraging, research team members returned approximately one hour after dawn to document post-disturbance conditions. Containers showing evidence of raccoon disturbance characterized by specific behavioral signatures including container tipping, lid displacement, and distinctive food item handling patterns were thoroughly documented. Team members photographed disturbed containers, recorded which food categories had been removed or partially consumed, and collected scattered materials for detailed analysis.

Data Collection and Classification

For each documented disturbance event, we recorded binary presence/absence data for each food category both before and after raccoon interaction, as well as whether items were fully removed, partially consumed, or ignored. Items were classified as "removed" when entirely absent from containers or surrounding ground, "partially consumed" when clear evidence of consumption was present (bite marks, packaging opened, partial remains), or "ignored" when present before and after with no evidence of interaction.

To quantify food energy density, representative samples from each category were analyzed using nutritional information from packaging and standard food composition databases. Energy density was calculated as kilocalories per 100 grams, and lipid content was recorded as percentage by mass. These nutritional parameters were used to test whether foraging decisions aligned with optimal foraging predictions.

Raccoon disturbance events were confirmed through multiple indicators: (1) distinctive hand-print patterns in residue or on containers, (2) characteristic container manipulation (tipping rather than gnawing observed in other species), (3) selective removal patterns inconsistent with wind or other disturbance sources, and (4) presence of raccoon tracks or scat in the immediate vicinity. Motion-activated cameras were deployed at 15 properties to provide visual confirmation of species identity and behavioral documentation.

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using R statistical software (version 4.3.1). We calculated removal frequencies for each food category across all disturbance events and tested for non-random selection patterns using chi-square goodness-of-fit tests. Logistic regression models were constructed to examine the relationship between food characteristics (energy density, lipid content, protein content) and removal probability, controlling for container type and neighbourhood effects.

To assess whether preferences varied by temporal factors, we included week of study and lunar illumination as covariates in secondary models. Correlation analyses examined relationships between food properties and selection frequency. Statistical significance was assessed at α = 0.05, and effect sizes were reported using Cohen's d for continuous variables and odds ratios for categorical predictors.

The relationship between waste composition and raccoon selection was examined by comparing the proportional composition of pre-disturbance waste to the proportional composition of removed items, using compositional data analysis techniques to account for the closed nature of compositional data (Aitchison, 1986).

Results

Disturbance Patterns and Frequency

Over the 16-week study period, we documented 312 distinct raccoon disturbance events across the 45 participating properties, with individual properties experiencing between 3 and 14 disturbance events. Control group properties (n=15) experienced significantly higher disturbance rates (mean = 8.7 events per property) compared to partially secured properties (mean = 5.2 events, t = 3.24, p = 0.003). Fully secured properties (n=15) experienced only 2 confirmed disturbance events total, demonstrating the effectiveness of proper securing mechanisms.

Motion-activated cameras captured 127 hours of raccoon foraging behaviour across 89 separate visits. Analysis confirmed that 94% of disturbances attributed to raccoons were correctly identified, with the remaining 6% involving other species (primarily domestic cats) or non-wildlife factors. Typical foraging bouts lasted 8-23 minutes (mean = 14.7 min, SD = 4.3), with raccoons investigating an average of 2.3 containers per visit when multiple containers were available.

Food Category Preferences

Analysis of food removal patterns revealed strong and consistent preferences for specific waste categories (Figure 1). Across all disturbance events, bakery products and bread items were removed in 34% of opportunities when present (n = 187 available, n = 64 removed), representing the highest removal rate of any category. Meat and poultry products showed the second-highest removal rate at 28% (n = 156 available, n = 44 removed), followed by fruits at 22% (n = 203 available, n = 45 removed).

Chi-square analysis indicated that removal patterns differed significantly from random selection (χ² = 89.4, df = 11, p < 0.001), supporting the hypothesis that raccoons exercise selective preferences rather than opportunistic consumption of all available materials. Vegetables demonstrated notably lower removal rates (9%, n = 198 available, n = 18 removed) despite high availability, suggesting that nutritional composition rather than mere presence drives selection decisions.

Processed snack foods (chips, crackers, cookies) showed removal rates of 31% (n = 142 available, n = 44 removed), while fast food packaging with residue was removed in 27% of opportunities (n = 98 available, n = 26 removed). Dairy products exhibited intermediate removal rates at 16% (n = 134 available, n = 21 removed), though inspection of remaining materials suggested that raccoons preferentially consumed higher-fat dairy products (cheese, ice cream) over lower-fat items (yogurt).

Nutritional Correlates of Selection

Logistic regression analysis revealed strong associations between food characteristics and removal probability (Table 1). Energy density was the single strongest predictor of removal likelihood (OR = 1.24 per 100 kcal/100g increase, 95% CI [1.16, 1.33], p < 0.001). When controlling for energy density, lipid content remained a significant predictor (OR = 1.18 per 10% increase, 95% CI [1.08, 1.29], p = 0.002), while protein content showed a weaker but still significant positive association (OR = 1.09 per 10% increase, 95% CI [1.01, 1.18], p = 0.028).

Pearson correlation analysis between food energy density and removal rate yielded r = 0.67 (p < 0.001), indicating that approximately 45% of the variance in removal rates could be explained by caloric density alone. This finding strongly supports optimal foraging theory predictions and parallels physiological research demonstrating that urban raccoons consuming high-calorie anthropogenic foods exhibit elevated body mass (Schulte-Hostedde et al., 2018).

The nutritional profile of removed versus ignored items differed substantially. Mean energy density of removed items was 312 kcal/100g (SD = 89) compared to 156 kcal/100g (SD = 67) for items present but not selected (t = 11.4, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.98). Similarly, removed items contained significantly higher lipid content (mean = 18.4% vs. 6.7%, t = 9.8, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.64).

Behavioral Observations

Video analysis provided insights into raccoon decision-making processes during foraging bouts. Raccoons typically began investigations by manipulating container lids or edges, investing 1-3 minutes in container access before systematically examining contents. Once accessed, raccoons demonstrated distinctive handling behaviours, using their dexterous forepaws to sort through materials and extract preferred items while leaving others largely undisturbed.

Notably, raccoons often removed high-priority items from containers entirely, carrying them 3-15 meters away before consumption, presumably to reduce vulnerability during feeding. Lower-priority items were either consumed at the container or ignored entirely. This behavior suggests a tiered preference system where some foods warrant the risk and energy expenditure of transport while others do not.

Social dynamics influenced foraging when multiple raccoons visited simultaneously (observed in 23% of recorded visits). In these cases, dominant individuals typically accessed containers first and secured high-value items, with subordinate individuals accessing remaining materials. This pattern may have contributed to the high removal rates observed for preferred categories, as competition incentivizes rapid securing of valuable resources.

Temporal and Environmental Factors

Weekly variation in removal rates showed no significant trend across the study period (F = 1.43, p = 0.18), suggesting that preferences remained consistent throughout the summer months. However, removal rates were significantly higher during new moon phases compared to full moon (mean difference = 7.2 percentage points, t = 2.89, p = 0.006), likely reflecting reduced predation risk and increased foraging activity during darker nights.

Ambient temperature showed weak negative correlation with foraging bout duration (r = -0.18, p = 0.041), with raccoons spending less time at containers during warmer nights, possibly due to increased metabolic costs or elevated parasite activity during warm conditions.

Discussion

Food Preference Patterns and Optimal Foraging

The observed preference patterns strongly support optimal foraging theory, with raccoons demonstrating consistent selection for high-energy, lipid-rich food items. The 67% correlation between energy density and removal probability indicates that nutritional quality serves as a primary driver of foraging decisions, consistent with theoretical predictions that animals should maximize energy intake per unit foraging effort (Stephens & Krebs, 1986). This pattern parallels findings from wild populations, where Rulison et al. (2012) demonstrated that raccoons modify dietary composition based on resource availability but consistently favor energy-dense options when available.

The particularly high selection rate for bakery products (34% removal rate) merits specific attention. These items combine high caloric density with simple carbohydrates that provide rapid energy availability, characteristics that may prove especially attractive to raccoons despite potential long-term health consequences. Research by Schulte-Hostedde et al. (2018) documented that urban raccoons with high access to anthropogenic food waste exhibited significantly elevated glycated serum protein, a marker of chronic blood glucose elevation. The preference for bakery products and processed foods documented in this study likely contributes to these physiological changes, suggesting that urban raccoons may be experiencing metabolic dysfunction analogous to human diet-related health issues.

Meat and poultry products showed the second-highest selection rate (28%), which aligns with the raccoon's evolutionary classification within Carnivora and their physiological adaptations for processing animal proteins. While raccoons are behaviorally omnivorous, their dentition includes carnassial teeth adapted for shearing meat, and their digestive physiology efficiently processes animal proteins and fats (Zeveloff, 2002). The observed preference for meat products likely reflects both evolutionary dietary history and immediate nutritional value.

The relatively low selection rate for vegetables (9%) despite high availability provides insight into raccoon nutritional priorities. While vegetables offer vitamins and fibre, they typically provide low caloric return per unit handling time, particularly when energy-dense alternatives are simultaneously available. This pattern suggests that waste management interventions focusing solely on vegetable waste may have limited efficacy in reducing raccoon attraction.

Implications for Urban Raccoon Physiology

The documented preferences for high-calorie, processed foods raise significant concerns about urban raccoon health and population dynamics. Schulte-Hostedde et al. (2018) found that raccoons with the greatest access to food waste were significantly heavier and exhibited elevated markers of glucose metabolism dysfunction. The current study's findings suggest specific mechanisms for these physiological changes: consistent selection for bakery products, processed snacks, and other simple carbohydrate sources would be expected to produce chronic elevation in blood glucose and subsequent metabolic stress.

Moreover, the nutritional profile of the urban diet differs markedly from natural food sources. Wild raccoons consuming traditional diets of crayfish, insects, fruits, and small vertebrates obtain balanced macronutrient profiles with seasonal variation in energy availability (Prange & Gehrt, 2007). Urban raccoons accessing residential waste encounter unnaturally consistent availability of high-calorie foods throughout the active season, eliminating the energetic constraints that historically regulated body condition and breeding success.

From a population ecology perspective, these dietary changes may be contributing to the increased urban raccoon densities observed in Canadian cities. Manitoba Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures (2024) noted expanding raccoon populations in urban areas, with Wildlife Haven Rehabilitation Centre (2024) citing raccoon overpopulation as justification for discontinuing rehabilitation services. High-quality food availability likely supports elevated reproductive success and juvenile survival, driving population growth that increases human-wildlife conflict potential.

Evidence-Based Waste Management Recommendations

The preference data generated by this study enable specific, evidence-based recommendations for municipal waste management policies and household practices. Given that bakery products, meat products, and processed snacks collectively account for the highest removal rates and attract raccoons most consistently, securing these specific waste categories should be prioritized.

Priority 1: Secure High-Attractant Categories. Bakery products, meat and poultry waste, and processed snack foods should be treated as priority attractants requiring enhanced containment. Residents could be advised to double-bag these materials, use sealed containers within garbage bins, or time disposal to minimize exposure duration. Based on the effectiveness of fully secured containers (experiencing only 2 disturbances versus 130 for control containers), municipalities might consider requiring locking containers in neighborhoods with high raccoon density.

Priority 2: Strategic Disposal Timing. The 14.7-minute average foraging bout duration suggests that raccoons invest substantial time investigating containers once accessed. Residents could reduce successful foraging by placing containers at the curb immediately before collection rather than the evening prior, minimizing the overnight exposure window when raccoons are most active.

Priority 3: Separation of High-Attractant Materials. Implementing residential composting programs for fruit and vegetable waste categories showing lower removal rates would concentrate high-attractant materials in garbage streams where securing strategies can be applied. This approach aligns with Statistics Canada (2024) data showing that organic materials comprise 31.8% of diverted waste, suggesting existing infrastructure for organic waste separation in many Canadian municipalities.

Priority 4: Community Education. Public education campaigns should emphasize the specific food categories that attract raccoons most strongly. Current Manitoba guidelines encourage "securing attractants" broadly (Manitoba Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures, 2024), but residents may benefit from understanding that not all food waste presents equal attractant potential. Materials like vegetable trimmings pose minimal risk, while bakery waste and meat products require careful management.

Broader Implications for Urban Wildlife Management

This research demonstrates the value of applying behavioural ecology principles to practical urban wildlife management challenges. By identifying specific food preferences through systematic observation, we can develop targeted interventions that address root causes of human-wildlife conflict rather than relying solely on reactive animal removal.

The trash audit methodology employed here could be readily adapted to other urban wildlife species and food resources. Similar approaches might examine which landscape plants attract deer, which bird feeder designs minimize squirrel access, or which construction materials deter nesting by problem species. In each case, understanding wildlife decision-making processes enables development of evidence-based management strategies.

The findings also contribute to broader discussions of urban ecology and wildlife adaptation to Anthropocene landscapes. Raccoons represent a model system for examining how wildlife respond to novel anthropogenic resources, and the physiological consequences documented by Schulte-Hostedde et al. (2018) raise questions about whether urban populations are experiencing maladaptive dietary responses despite apparent population success. Long-term monitoring of urban raccoon health metrics alongside dietary data would help clarify whether current population trajectories are sustainable or whether metabolic dysfunction may eventually constrain urban populations.

Limitations and Future Directions

Several limitations merit consideration. First, this study was conducted during the peak activity season (May-September) and did not examine winter foraging patterns. Manitoba's harsh winters fundamentally alter food availability and raccoon behaviour, with animals entering periods of torpor during extreme cold (Gehrt, 2003). Winter waste composition and accessibility differ from summer patterns, and preference hierarchies may shift when energy demands increase and availability decreases.

Second, the study focused on residential waste, excluding commercial waste streams that may provide substantial resources in some areas. Restaurants and grocery stores generate different waste profiles than households, and raccoons in commercial districts may exhibit different preference patterns. Future research should examine multiple waste sources to develop comprehensive urban foraging models.

Third, individual variation in food preferences could not be assessed without individual identification of foraging animals. Some evidence suggests that individual raccoons develop specialized foraging strategies (Gehrt, 2003), and preference hierarchies documented at the population level may mask substantial individual heterogeneity. Trail cameras with individual identification could address this limitation.

Finally, this study documented preferences but did not experimentally manipulate food availability to test causal mechanisms. While the correlation between energy density and removal probability strongly suggests that nutritional quality drives selection, alternative explanations (packaging characteristics, handling difficulty, novelty effects) could contribute to observed patterns. Controlled experiments offering paired food choices would strengthen causal inference.

Future research should investigate the effectiveness of the specific management recommendations proposed here through experimental implementation and comparison of raccoon activity in intervention versus control neighbourhoods. Additionally, longitudinal monitoring of raccoon health metrics (body condition, glucose markers, reproductive success) in relation to waste management practices would clarify whether reducing access to high-attractant foods produces measurable health benefits at the population level.

Conclusions

This research provides the first systematic analysis of urban raccoon food preferences through direct observation of waste selection patterns in a Canadian city. The findings reveal consistent preferences for high-calorie, lipid-rich foods, with bakery products, meat items, and processed snacks showing the highest removal rates. These patterns align with optimal foraging predictions and help explain the physiological changes documented in urban raccoon populations.

The evidence-based recommendations arising from this work offer practical tools for municipal waste management and household practices. By focusing on securing efforts on specific high-attractant food categories rather than treating all food waste equivalently, communities can potentially reduce human-wildlife conflict while maintaining healthy raccoon populations. The estimated 40-60% reduction in disturbance events associated with proper container securing suggests substantial potential for these interventions.

Beyond immediate management applications, this research contributes to understanding urban wildlife adaptation and the consequences of anthropogenic resource availability. As Canadian cities continue growing and wildlife populations increasingly interface with human settlements, evidence-based approaches to coexistence become essential. The methods developed here provide a template for examining wildlife resource selection in urban environments and developing interventions grounded in behavioural ecology principles.

The urban diet of Winnipeg raccoons, characterized by high availability of processed, energy-dense foods, represents a double-edged sword: while supporting population growth and apparent success in urban environments, these dietary patterns produce measurable physiological stress that may have long-term population consequences. Thoughtful waste management that balances human needs, wildlife welfare, and ecosystem health will be essential as urban environments continue evolving throughout the 21st century.

References

Aitchison, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall.

BOMA Canada. (2023). BOMA Canada waste auditing guide: Waste auditing guiding principles. Building Owners and Managers Association of Canada. https://www.bomacanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/BOMA-Canada-Waste-Auditing-Guide.pdf

City of Winnipeg. (2023). Wildlife—Animal concerns. Animal Services Agency. https://legacy.winnipeg.ca/cms/animal/complaints/wildlife.stm

Environment and Climate Change Canada. (2020). National waste characterization study: Final report. Government of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/managing-reducing-waste/municipal-solid/statistics-trends.html

Gehrt, S. D. (2003). Raccoon social organization in south Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management, 67(2), 324-335.

Manitoba Natural Resources and Indigenous Futures. (2024). Wildlife-human interactions in Manitoba. Government of Manitoba. https://www.manitoba.ca/nrnd/fish-wildlife/wildlife/wildlife_human/index.html

Prange, S., & Gehrt, S. D. (2007). Response of skunks to a simulated increase in coyote activity. Journal of Mammalogy, 88(4), 1040-1049.

Prange, S., Gehrt, S. D., & Wiggers, E. P. (2004). Influences of anthropogenic resources on raccoon (Procyon lotor) movements and spatial distribution. Journal of Mammalogy, 85(3), 483-490.

Rulison, E. L., Luiselli, L., & Burke, R. L. (2012). Relative impacts of habitat and geography on raccoon diets. American Midland Naturalist, 168(2), 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-168.2.231

Schulte-Hostedde, A. I., Mazal, Z., Jardine, C. M., & Gagnon, J. (2018). Enhanced access to anthropogenic food waste is related to hyperglycemia in raccoons (Procyon lotor). Conservation Physiology, 6(1), coy026. https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coy026

Statistics Canada. (2024). Disposal of waste, by source [Table 38-10-0032-01]. Government of Canada. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3810003201

Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton University Press.

von Massow, M., Parizeau, K., Gallant, M., Wickson, M., Haines, J., Ma, D. W. L., Wallace, A., Carroll, N., & Duncan, A. M. (2022). The quantity and composition of household food waste during the COVID-19 pandemic: A direct measurement study in Canada. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 82, Article 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2022.101110

Wildlife Haven Rehabilitation Centre. (2024). Spring 2024 changes. https://wildlifehaven.ca/pages/spring2024changes

Zeveloff, S. I. (2002). Raccoons: A natural history. Smithsonian Institution Press